is this the first time a court treated btc as an asset? Or atleast in korea? 191 BTC btc is a lot and it's probably too valuable to resist.
Well a Judge ruling in the Netherlands did say that bitcoin represents a value and is transferable. In the court's view, it thus shows characteristics of a property right. I think most will agree that property rights is an asset, so I believe that this is not the first time for a Court to rule Bitcoin as an asset.