Re: Overview of Bitcointalk Signature Anti-Spam Campaign Managers
⭐ Merited by SFR10 (2)
How about including rank and/or sign-up date?
You should probably clarify or confirm those escrowed amounts as well as some of them seem way off. Are they total amounts held over their lifetime or all at once? I suspect people have given both. They can also be misleading. Somebody holding 1 bitcoin a hundred times doesn't mean they can be trusted with 100 bitcoins. Also, somebody holding 100 bitcoins five years or so ago probably wouldn't even be worth 1 bitcoin now. The figure I gave was the highest amount I've held at any one time and was probably over £10k cash value at the time, and I think things like these should be stipulated as they can be very misleading or even give a false sense of security. In this case I think the highest value people have held at any one time is a better indicator. Somebody could quite easily hold on to many small amounts dozens of times until his total is 10 bitcoins or whatever then just disappear if anyone every gives him a large amount at once.
Hilariousandco:
Hilariousandco,a Lamborghini Member,
The one and only. Skurrt skurrt.
You should probably remove the part including theymos (unless he's said otherwise). He may trust me to moderate the forum at a Global level but this doesn't necessarily mean he would vouch for me to hold onto large amounts of cash (or run signature campaigns - not that he doesn't or wouldn't but I feel unless he's specifically said this it shouldn't be here and may give me an unfair advantage).
You should probably clarify or confirm those escrowed amounts as well as some of them seem way off. Are they total amounts held over their lifetime or all at once? I suspect people have given both. They can also be misleading. Somebody holding 1 bitcoin a hundred times doesn't mean they can be trusted with 100 bitcoins. Also, somebody holding 100 bitcoins five years or so ago probably wouldn't even be worth 1 bitcoin now. The figure I gave was the highest amount I've held at any one time and was probably over £10k cash value at the time, and I think things like these should be stipulated as they can be very misleading or even give a false sense of security. In this case I think the highest value people have held at any one time is a better indicator. Somebody could quite easily hold on to many small amounts dozens of times until his total is 10 bitcoins or whatever then just disappear if anyone every gives him a large amount at once.
Hilariousandco:
Hilariousandco,a Lamborghini Member,
The one and only. Skurrt skurrt.
He on one of the person who is trusted by a great deal of people in bitcointalk,including theymos. 
You should probably remove the part including theymos (unless he's said otherwise). He may trust me to moderate the forum at a Global level but this doesn't necessarily mean he would vouch for me to hold onto large amounts of cash (or run signature campaigns - not that he doesn't or wouldn't but I feel unless he's specifically said this it shouldn't be here and may give me an unfair advantage).