wouldn't like to be mean, but i have to comment that this show must end one way or another
so many coins changed algo succesfully with minimal issues.
yesterday AEON forked and all went smoothly, at least from what i understand.
can't really think of anything else than a suggestion to ETN team to hire devs to do the job. It is so obvious that there is incompetence in there.
If ETN want to do something more than to have the luck of a failed coin initiative, then they will need to take action now, still it might already too late.
(little hodler of ETN till the death of the coin)
so many coins changed algo succesfully with minimal issues.
yesterday AEON forked and all went smoothly, at least from what i understand.
can't really think of anything else than a suggestion to ETN team to hire devs to do the job. It is so obvious that there is incompetence in there.
If ETN want to do something more than to have the luck of a failed coin initiative, then they will need to take action now, still it might already too late.
(little hodler of ETN till the death of the coin)
Many coins are 1on1 copies (some with small changes), ETN isn't a simple copy from Monero.
ETN is an very tweaked monero.
You can't compare it with other coins what has forked. Also the diff was very, very high because of al the asic miners. Other coins also didnt had this problem.
If it was just an copy from monero i would totally agree with you, however it is not a simple copy. And problems are there to be fixed
