It isn't against forum rule to open up a thread about your own escrow service if it defeats the entire purpose of an escrow I think it is only your bias opinion about escrow in general if you find any link/ref stating that opening an escrow thread should have at least a trusted feedback I will in all sense accept my red trust as justified as you said on my trust wall.
That's why I have a tremendous 2% fees so someone will not think of me as a fraud escrower just waiting a chance to run away with their money.
Alternatively it seems I pissed hilariousandco in any way that's why he deems my red trust is for what is worth it somehow.
He cited why he left the feedback (see below) and I agree with him; you simply don't have the Trust to be an escrow.
You also left retaliatory feedback, doesn't make you look any better but you do have a history of crap feedback.
"Offering escrow services and the only trade history and money he has seemingly been trusted with is $50. As with any user offering such services under similar circumstances they're either very naive or a straight up scammer. Account's password was also recently reset and it has also previously been used as collateral for a loan, which he seems to have taken several microloans out over the past year. Far too many red flags here. See ref for further details."