like i said i dont give a shit about the fork i dont have a z9 mini, but that does not change the fact that asics help secure the network, and that doesnt change the fact zencash has been attacked and will be attacked even with an algo change, you even think what those hash on nicehash is gonna be doing, its also a fact its begger than our network hash

Suppose it's only a coincidence these 51% attacks occur on coins that:

#1:  Declared they will fork away from ASIC's.
#2:  All within a short time after CONFIRMING they will fork away from ASIC's.
#3:  BITMAIN has a "motive" to implement a 51% attack based on developers of Equihash coins making a declaration they will fork.
#4:  The fact that BITMAIN revealed they have a Z9 (not "mini") proves it would be VERY easy to implement a 51% attack.  Which would ALSO prove they have mined with them for quite some time.

By you coming on here with your comment as a NEW ACCOUNT only suggests to me you're part of a FALSE FLAG 51% attack.  Meaning, BITMAIN implements the 51% attack then sends proxy accounts out on social media to say we need their ASIC's to protect coins from attacks while they were the ones implementing the attacks all along.  We're NOT stupid.  Tell it to someone who's new to mining and doesn't know any better.

Once these coins are forked, we'll see BITMAIN LIED to Zooko in regards to not private/secret mining AND about not having a larger Equihash rig that's been mining for a LONG time.  Hell, it's quite obvious they had the Z9 (not mini) BEFORE announcing their Z9 mini for sale.  

How will we see BITMAIN lied?  Once everyone notes how much the network hash rate drops.  Especially, if ZEC actually forks and we witness their hash rate drop.  BITMAIN, currently has their hash rate distributed somewhat equally among BTG, ZEN, BCP and ZEC.