Any DT member who trusts Anduck can counter Vod's rating if they feel that this is too harsh.
You are suggesting DT2 members to abuse their power? didn't expect anything less from you. this is a bad practice. one does not simply favor some people over others just because they were given a position of power> DT2.
That is not abuse. What the hell is wrong with you? Do search up what abuse means. Misuse would make sense but abuse, no.
It's not even misuse. It a perfectly valid theymos-endorsed use case for the trust system. It can be used to counter a potentially unfair negative rating.
Wrong, that is just wrong, that is misuse of DT and that could mean that Vod's feedback worth nothing, in other words:
"Vod, we are not happy about your feedback, instead of providing our reasons we would like to screw you over and use our DT position as a personal tool and not to use it to better the forum and it's community's business affairs, we just want the OP's profile to look OK by default when people only are looking at his profile without reading his trust page, therefore we would like to deceive people by countering your ratings".
Complete nonsense. It just means that someone disagrees with Vod.
The right thing to do is:
Dear and respected forum member Vod, we believe that tagging the OP for something that happened 2 years ago is not the right use of your DT power, we as the community members would like to voice our concerns and ask you to correct this issue please.
Then the community would see Vod's reaction, they could then tag Vod if they see that he is not listening to reason, if Vod has done more good than bad, they shouldn't kick him out of DT, they should show him the same treatment> tagging him for not complying to the wills of the general consensus.
Countering Vod's feedback is equal as telling him to go fuck yourself.
Who's "we" and "they"? Your handpicked forum politburo?