O.k.  Fair enough.  I have a bit of a pet peeve when peeps post links and ideas but make absolutely no comment about what they are posting.

LukeJr has been a decent contributor to bitcoin over the years, and he frequently provides decent insights, including technical contributions and commentary.

I think that largely he is criticizing the bcasher nutjobs in their assertions that bitcoin has to "get back to it's original vision," and a lot of the bullshit originalism that bcashers spout out in order to criticize various bitcoin evolutions, including segwit and including lightning, etc.

LukeJr might be overstating the case a bit in order to make a his point, but what he is saying is quite understandable.  I personally have concluded that the foundations of bitcoin are quite strong, and there are some aspects of bitcoin that need to be maintained in order to stay with bitcoin's decentralized censorship resistance goals, and the longer that bitcoin maintains its security and its preventative measures of being difficult to change (while still evolving with innovations like segwit and lightning network) the stronger it is going to become and the more difficult it is going to be to take down.  Core contributors certainly have the right kinds of ideas in terms of the benefits of small blocks with block propagation and fairness of keeping efficiencies in a decentralized network, and largely the bcasher nutjobers are a small incompetent group that don't really know the fuck what they are doing except to strive to engage in bullshit tactics to attack bitcoin.  LukeJr is merely highlighting the dynamic that technical progress is certainly being built upon the foundations of bitcoin, while pointing out some of the misdirection and misleading talking points of the bcasher original vision bullshit.