itod,
The promised mining speed of 400GH is what HashFast's customers paid for.
Exceeding that advertised minimum by a whopping 100+ GH (25%) is highly relevant to their ROI, regardless of difficulty.
If we only shipped 300GH instead of 400GH, I'm sure HashFast customers would find that anything but "totally irrelevant."
...
Best,
-HF_CL
I was positive you have figured out mining math, but now I'm not sure if this is not the case, or you are just pulling my leg. Let me ask you a question, please answer me this:
Do you think your customers would prefer
a) 300GHs on time (Oct 31st) or
b) 600GHs Dec 31st, two months late?
Which option, a) or b) would make them more money? Please think twice before answering this.
I still don't believe your answer will be wrong to this, you have to be pulling my leg with "GHs are important" nonsense.
Edit:
Let me change 400 to 300 under option a), so GHs unimportance would be more obvious.