Ok, maybe my wording was not correct - what I mean is that we are the missing piece in the cryptomarket. In order to scale we are working on the integration of an ML-based semantic search algorithm to facilitate information aggregation and support our qualitative rating process. Overall, we are planning with 1000 ICOs / per year by 2020 that are rated by us. Moreover, we will also provide additional crypto data (time series data, hype factor, benchmarking, etc.) that leads to our 360 degrees platform.
Thanks for clarifying. This sounds amazing, but how do you ensure that you are not rating scams with a high number? Your team looks pretty young and I doubt that you have the expertise to tell which ICO is good and which one not. Or what makes you eligible to rate ICOs? Do you have background in rating?
I fully understand your arguments - that's why we have onboarded various top-notch strategic advisors. E.g. Luzius Meisser is the founder of the Bitcoin Association Switzerland and THE crypto-pioneer in Switzerland (since 2012 in the space), or Alessandro de Carli who is the technical Blockchain Advisor of Aeternity (top 25 cryptocurrency). We do not claim that we have all the skills in-house - where further insights are needed (legally, technically etc.) we however know the right people to assist here. Since we are processing not only public data but also confidential data (an ICO firm is required at the beginning to provide us various documents that are not public) we assure that based on the facts we do not rate scams well.