Post
Topic
Board Mining (Altcoins)
Re: SRBMiner Cryptonight AMD GPU Miner V1.5.9
by
MaxMidnite
on 08/06/2018, 14:39:26 UTC
Hi man + others

Thanks for the info, these are my new set of results; (double threads = true)

I cannot push this over 86 with 80 being most stable (5200+ hash)

ALL CARDS ARE 8GB

"gpu_conf" :
[
   { "id" : 0, "intensity" : 86, "worksize" : 8, "threads" : 2, "kernel" : 0},
   { "id" : 1, "intensity" : 86, "worksize" : 8, "threads" : 2, "kernel" : 0},
   { "id" : 2, "intensity" : 86, "worksize" : 8, "threads" : 2, "kernel" : 0},
   { "id" : 3, "intensity" : 86, "worksize" : 8, "threads" : 2, "kernel" : 0},
   { "id" : 4, "intensity" : 86, "worksize" : 8, "threads" : 2, "kernel" : 0},
   { "id" : 5, "intensity" : 86, "worksize" : 8, "threads" : 2, "kernel" : 0}
]
}

[2018-06-08 15:09:52] GPU0:    896 H/s [T: 57c, RPM: 2187, CC: 1150 MHz, MC: 2175 MHz][BUS:5]
[2018-06-08 15:09:52] GPU1:    842 H/s [T: 72c, RPM: 2128, CC: 1150 MHz, MC: 2175 MHz][BUS:1]
[2018-06-08 15:09:52] GPU2:    848 H/s [T: 60c, RPM: 2031, CC: 1150 MHz, MC: 2175 MHz][BUS:4]
[2018-06-08 15:09:52] GPU3:    852 H/s [T: 63c, RPM: 2127, CC: 1150 MHz, MC: 2175 MHz][BUS:3]
[2018-06-08 15:09:52] GPU4:    893 H/s [T: 54c, RPM: 2918, CC: 1150 MHz, MC: 2175 MHz][BUS:2]
[2018-06-08 15:09:52] GPU5:    893 H/s [T: 44c, RPM: 3036, CC: 1150 MHz, MC: 2175 MHz][BUS:6]
[2018-06-08 15:09:52] Total:   5224 H/s


If I do I get this error:
 Error CL_MEM_OBJECT_ALLOCATION_FAILURE when calling clEnqueueNDRangeKernel for kernel 0 for DeviceID 1 (Thread 3)

Set the intensity 72, it is the best for v7 at 588, decreasing temporarily the memory frequency for the test.
588 with such settings should produce about 950-970 hashes v7


Huum its like little difference but more stability.


"gpu_conf" :
[
   { "id" : 0, "intensity" : 72, "worksize" : 8, "threads" : 2, "kernel" : 0},
   { "id" : 1, "intensity" : 72, "worksize" : 8, "threads" : 2, "kernel" : 0},
   { "id" : 2, "intensity" : 72, "worksize" : 8, "threads" : 2, "kernel" : 0},
   { "id" : 3, "intensity" : 72, "worksize" : 8, "threads" : 2, "kernel" : 0},
   { "id" : 4, "intensity" : 72, "worksize" : 8, "threads" : 2, "kernel" : 0},
   { "id" : 5, "intensity" : 72, "worksize" : 8, "threads" : 2, "kernel" : 0}
]
}

[2018-06-08 15:38:53] GPU0:    920 H/s [T: 59c, RPM: 2187, CC: 1150 MHz, MC: 2175 MHz][BUS:5]
[2018-06-08 15:38:53] GPU1:    704 H/s [T: 74c, RPM: 2124, CC: 1150 MHz, MC: 2175 MHz][BUS:1]
[2018-06-08 15:38:53] GPU2:    872 H/s [T: 63c, RPM: 2027, CC: 1150 MHz, MC: 2175 MHz][BUS:4]
[2018-06-08 15:38:53] GPU3:    850 H/s [T: 67c, RPM: 2152, CC: 1150 MHz, MC: 2175 MHz][BUS:3]
[2018-06-08 15:38:53] GPU4:    920 H/s [T: 57c, RPM: 2901, CC: 1150 MHz, MC: 2175 MHz][BUS:2]
[2018-06-08 15:38:53] GPU5:    920 H/s [T: 45c, RPM: 3037, CC: 1150 MHz, MC: 2175 MHz][BUS:6]
[2018-06-08 15:38:53] Total:   5186 H/s

Not sure why some of the GPU produce different results, all are same really