I've been mining since 9am gmt+0 on wednesday, at 3pm on wednesday i got my last transaction, since then nothing. Im also not appearing on the hourly graphs or the 'Expected Payouts if Block Found Now',
http://treasurequarry.com:9844/static/graphs.html?Hourmy wallet address is:
i3gMKjQ4AxTWsbtWd3VXSJQHt6rwVvxbBB
Can you explain why this is happening please?
orion94, can you give me the exact command or settings that you're using for mining, and the hashrate that your miner is reporting, as your graph only shows short spikes, which isn't giving much information to help me answer your query.
I'm using scryptminer GUI for cpu mining at 13kh/s. Im using my wallet address i3gMKjQ4AxTWsbtWd3VXSJQHt6rwVvxbBB i've removed the psuedo share difficulty at the end of it as it gave me nothing but a red graph and no coins.
Settings i have are:
Threads: 4
Scantime: 15
Port: 9844
My wallet is updated and synced.
I've been mining on an average of around 12kh/s, but mostly its at 13k/s. WHen the hashrate drops to 12 it only stays there for around 5 to 10 minutes at the most. I usually mine from 9am to 12am. When I was receiving coins my miner was in sync with the graph, all the shares my miner showed were shown on the graph.
By percentage of efficiency do you mean the percentage next to each share? They're at 100%.
I did add the psuedo difficulty again, I used "+0.00011641"
Does anyone know another CPU miner I could try? I'm currently using scrypt gui miner.
orion94, Share difficulty at the pool is 0.235 as I write (see the "share difficulty" on
http://treasurequarry.com:9844/static/ ) . With the way p2pool works, you need to find a share before you start to get a run of payments for that share. Payments for that share will then start when p2pool finds the next block and will continue until the share has run out, at which point payments for that share will stop . You need to find another share before each run of payments starts.
At an average of 12.5kh/s and current pool share difficulty of 0.235, it will take on average 0.93 days-worth of continuous hashing to find a 0.235 difficulty share accrording to the summary at
http://www.coinwarz.com/calculators/infinitecoin-mining-calculator/?h=12.50&p=500.00&pc=0.10&pf=0.00&d=0.23500000&r=16384.00000000&er=0.00000001&hc=0.00If you've been mining from 9am to 12am ( 3hours per day) that's one eighth of a day that you're hashing, so you instead of taking 0.93 days, you'd need to multipy that by 8, so it would likely take you 7.44 days of hashing 3 hours a days at 12.5kh/s to find each share.
I see from the block explorer that you 've receive 2 more runs of payments since yesterday
http://exploretheblocks.com:2750/address/i3gMKjQ4AxTWsbtWd3VXSJQHt6rwVvxbBBAlso from the block explorer I see that you've received
24537.92097002 Infinitecoins since 8 December 2013 (ie since 7 days ago). If you've been mining 3 hours a day for 7 days that's 21 hours. I would estimate that the global infinitecoin network difficulty during the last week may have been hovering around 1 . Using difficulty 1 and your hashrate of 12.5 kh/s in the Infinitecoin calculator we see from the bottom part of the results page how many coins you may have expected on average....
http://www.coinwarz.com/calculators/infinitecoin-mining-calculator/?h=12.50&p=500.00&pc=0.10&pf=0.00&d=1&r=16384.00000000&er=0.00000001&hc=0.00 shows 171.66 coins per hour. Multiply this by 21 hours of hashing gives an estimate of
3604.86 coins expected. Seeing you've received 24537.92097002 coins from the pool , if looks like you're doing very well indeed.

Could you please have a look at i7dy7soYSrqtuU2pu2dHm1qtBhs5JUX49S and tell me what is going on? I don't see anything on the graph and stopped receiving coins 3-4 hours ago.
I got a total of 100 Kh/s pointed your way from 3 different computers.
limburatorul, please see the first paragraph of my reply above to orion94. With the way that p2pool works, payments do not necessarily keep being made continuously as you need to find a share of adequate difficulty (current pool difficulty = 0.235) to start getting each run of payments. If you're not already doing so, it's worth adding an appropriate +number for your pseudoshare difficulty for each computer (as detailed on the first post in this thread) . This may help your graphs show better.
