You are saying 'my' system is flawed.
I ask Why.
You say, It's in this book.
I am saying "Government is not the only people doing research"
You're asking me to research, and find out which projects are funded how.
I say, "no".
If I had all of this in my head, it would be a simple matter to regurgitate it. It's not, I'd have to look it up, and for that matter, look up where to look it up. Doesn't sound like my idea of a fun evening. All I'm asking is that you explain your position, something which I have created 3 threads to do for mine. So. Whine all you want. I don't feel like wasting my time on you any more.
Your system is not proven. The burden lies upon you to show how it can work at every objection put forth against it. This is your system that you want. You're not being scientific, and that makes your argument very flimsy.
There are countless issues that you have just brushed aside. You're not interested in making your theory strong. You're only interested in making it sound like it's more developed than it is. We can discuss discrimination, ownership, sustainability, the environment, technology, safety, the list goes on. And every issue - you think you've won - but you haven't. You've only blustered your way through, happy that you think you've presented a formidable defense, but if you'd take the blinders off, you'd realize how woefully short your arguments come up against numerous objections to it.
Since this thread is about space, let's talk space. Here goes...
Compare the accomplishments of NASA to privately funded space accomplishments.