Both of those can be answered with the same thing, so I won't bother quoting them.
Obviously, you don't go to Coke News for information about Coke. Dur. You go to independent news sources, such as the
No Agenda show, which aren't corporately funded, but donation supported. A free media is essential to accountability, whether Gov't or corporate.
But the problem won't be limited to Coke News. It'll spread to every news source Coke advertises in and every one owned by a company associated with them. Yes, I go to alternative news sources and a lot of other people do, too. What good does that do when 99% of people take the most convenient and most entertaining news option every time? Obviously alternative news exists now and it failed to even make a dent in the sales of the corporations I referred to, so how is that a solution?
This is the problem that we see again and again and again with libertarianism - it ignores the human element entirely. It assumes most people to be rational, intelligent, and moral and ignores mountains evidence to the contrary. It's like the honor system for politics. You also ignore the fact that nobody with a full time job and a family to take care of has time to sit around searching obscure alternative news sites for the hundreds of products in their homes. Not to mention the frequently-encountered issue of a needed item being made by two or three companies who
all commit the same sorts of abuses. Who do you buy from then? How many families do you seriously think sit down and try to tackle these issues?