I wouldn't have taken it because having a unit a month earlier would be worth the difference in price. But now it sounds like that won't be the case.
"
Sounds like?" It's definitely the case (not that you'd know from the Cointerra OP or offical posts).
Oh sorry, I forgot you're still at an early point in the early stages of the grieving process (IE 'denial'), having been only recently informed of the latest expansion of Cointerra's delay.
I thought we were to stay on the subject of Cointerra, and stop the whole "let's change the subject to [OFF-TOPIC ASIC COMPANY]."
Why are alleged shortcomings of [OFF-TOPIC ASIC COMPANY] being used as a defense of Cointerra's failures?
[OFF-TOPIC ASIC COMPANY] has nothing to do with Cointerra's
failure to deliver their promised December hardware in December.[OFF-TOPIC ASIC COMPANY] has nothing to do with Cointerra's slimy practice of
selling a chip that didn't exist at a huge premium for a delivery date that was impossible to meet.[OFF-TOPIC ASIC COMPANY] has nothing to do with Cointerra's slimy practice of
hiding the announcement of their delay in a bunch of technical gobbledygook where hardly anyone would see it.[OFF-TOPIC ASIC COMPANY] has nothing to do with Cointerra's
failure to ensure all Batch One customers were aware of the delay and the option to switch to "Feb" orders instead.
[OFF-TOPIC ASIC COMPANY] has nothing to do with Cointerra
failing to use their official forum account to keep customers up to date, and it falling on newbs to relay crucial information from press releases and phone calls to customer service.