Where is the lie? show me and then see if I am willing to remove a false negative feedback or not.
"Vod has given actmyname positive trust because actmyname has tried to hide the truth from the public by countering Vod's negative feedback on Anduck"
"After getting on DT2 it seems that marlboroza account has changed hands. this is bad and it is clearly an evidence of a deeper corruption within trust system of this forum."
"Misuse/abuse of DT position. untrustworthy behavior. this person shouldn't hold any power, because he is corrupted and doesn't know how to use DT power he has over 99.99% of people in this forum."
Let's start with those.
Seeing how you ignored the response to the bolded part - I take it you lied again and you're not going to remove the lies from your feedback?
I would change my negative trust on matlboroza because I have to admit that I was too harsh on him, yes I am willing to change my tag on him to neutral just in case if he ever reset his password, we could have a reference as to when he has changed his email address. regarding Vod's feedback:
I am willing to give him a chance if I see that he is willing to admit that tagging actmyname with some green was a misuse of the trust this community has given him. I am also willing to give actmyname a chance if he admits that countering Vod's feedback without having any past dealings with Anduck was wrong.
I am constantly changing my methods and I am trying to improve myself based on the reactions from the community members. some DT members are not like that unfortunately, they would tag somebody and would leave them for dead.