I'm not defending sportsbet , but can't take single accusation as it's the only way to determine if a site is trusted or not
That is a logical fallacy lol If a company scams 100 bitcoins from their customer, would you wait for them to scam another 100 to take their fraudulent practices into consideration? I'm not sure if you're too nice or just not smart enough.Scam is a scam, regardless of the amount stolen.
so my general advice is to avoid it , not because it's a scam but because you will be getting way better price betting somewhere else
I don't mind getting a low price if the website is trustworthy.Giving high odds to attract customers and then stealing their money is no way better than the former.
nah it's not a fallacy , they are saying that the user had suspicious acts and you can't be sure if that was the case or not ( that's why I'm against accepting bets without getting network confirmation )
regarding the odds no , you shouldn't take low prices even if the site is trustworthy since long term you won't make money
you can find trusted sites like betking , bitcoinrush and nitrogen that they will take your bets at higher odds than sportsbet
funny most of the people commented don't know how sportsbetting work , if they did they wouldn't accuse sportsbet cause sportsbet is making tons of money by just accepting bets