Read all the
27 comments at the provided link. You can't just be lazy to read only what I commented here. I can't copy this entire linked page of comments into this thread.
There is no science of man-made global warming. Period. The comments at the linked thread are irrefutable.
Never in millions of years of cycles has temperature risen after CO2 does. Temperate always rises at least 600 years before C02 does. So C02 can't be the cause. Duh!
Al Gore lied. He didn't show his chart zoomed in.
I'm familiar with the ice core studies. I've read them. Yes, Al Gore did a lot of lying, starting with his 1988 Senate hearings, where he and a friend vandalized the air conditioners so that it was very hot during those hearings on 'global warming'. August, I think it was...
Here's one for you. There is no "scientific hypothesis" of man made global warming. There are a group of observations, predictions and premises. There may be formulated dozens of area-specific scientific hypotheses, each of which can be tested. But these are area, region or otherwise narrowly focused of necessity, otherwise they cannot be tested.
Here is a sample hypothesis.
Arctic ice melt is more influenced by soot accumulation from Asia than from increases in CO2.Whatever you think about the matter, we could all likely agree that was a testable hypothesis....
Back up to the OP: I really suspect that this post would not be allowed under the rules that Reddit now has, although to me it seems totally straightforward as a question...
Not good.
I decided a long time ago to act in forum the way I talk in everyday's life. I would get abused but never abuse back or censor, and keep it cool.
I realized true believers never need a hammer to nail their ideas to others, never use force. Obvious is obvious. Complicated solutions or explanations last the length of some scientist's grant or their natural life then get forgotten by history.