Yes I can shed some light on the matter. At one time it was for sale but no longer after finding out that such wasn't permitted in spite of believe such was, even posting such as proof. I was mistaken. I in no way wanted to get my cred in jeopardy while serving the community along with advancing my ICO.
If this was the case wouldn't you have tried selling the account as this account, and not some throw away?
I like this theory. Most of them in this thread were all boring but this is fired up crack( I DON'T TAKE DRUGS,FYI). Can someone else call Gleb to verify if this theory is true or false?
Calling him is useless. It literally proves nothing other than he's willing to potentially protect the person who bought it by claiming he's still in control.