Under anarchism, I understand above all the political doctrine aimed at undermining state power. How can you be an anarchist, if you are a philosopher, I do not understand. For example, you talked about friendship: is friendship possible between a man and a woman? You reasoned like a philosopher, but where in this reasoning is the place of anarchism? Similarly, the state: the rejection of the state by the philosopher - a normal thing, but still it (the state) must first of all be a unit of analysis (even through overcoming the rejection), and not overthrow.