Re: Is it legal to give a negative trust to a 'BM' who ended a scam project?
If the Bounty Manager knew that the project is scam and still promoted it than they deserve a negative trust.
But if they didn't knew about that, they are no different from bounty participants as they get paid to advertise.
If bounty manager are to be given negative trust for working on a scam project, bounty participants too deserve one as they too promote for payment.
But if they didn't knew about that, they are no different from bounty participants as they get paid to advertise.
If bounty manager are to be given negative trust for working on a scam project, bounty participants too deserve one as they too promote for payment.
How come that the bounty participant deserve to have a negative trust by participating a scam project? In the first place, participant give their trust on the bounty managers, second, bounty managers must examine their project carefully by conducting a verification on the team members of that project before accepting it and lastly, bounty participant didn't get paid by promoting a scam project.
Same accusations you have given to a bounty manager, tje bounty participants must as well be given negative trust because they've participated in a scam project, they've promoted it and because of that many investors invested a lot. So theres no difference at all between a bounty manager and the bounty hunters, well if thats the case you want to give to a bounty manager then bounty participants too may as well be given a negative trust.
This was just my fair opinion.
