required at the least to report as a money transmitter at worst as a banking institution.
The expenses for these will make it so very few actually run a hub once enforcement of the AML/KYC regulations begin.
You sound like a flat-earther or anti-vaxxer. Tinfoil-hat-wearing conspiracy theorist type. Repeating the same unfounded, delusional, reductive reasoning because you have no substantiative arguments. You can say it as many times as you like, but it's no more likely to occur than KYC/AML for on-chain nodes. You're still enabling payments to be processed by validating them if you run a full node. In which case, BCH will come to an end before LN, because LN has more nodes than BCH and will be more difficult to pursue. Clearly every single person running a Lightning node right now thinks you're talking nonsense, otherwise they wouldn't be running one.
Reports suggest that something like 20% of all internet activity is related to piracy and no regulators have managed to stop that yet. They'll have the same or less success with Lightning, since I get the impression that torrenting is easier to monitor than the act of signing transactions is. If you torrent without a proxy or VPN, there are websites that can tell you how many files you've downloaded, but there's no way of recording how many Lightning transactions you've sent or received, because that information isn't public. I wish the regulators the best of luck, they're going to need it.
LOL,
You don't read much about the US Laws ,
do you?Be sure to post what prison, they send you too and I will mail you a cake with a file in it.

And in the equally unlikely scenario they criminalise being an absolute imbecile on the internet, we won't even do that for you.