I recently read a report by a trustable source the indicates how EOS, after sucking value from Ethereum during a year, has been selling large amounts to finance its operations and development. The only difference with the rest of the ICOs is the scale.

The mark of having a good education is in one's ability to evaluate and distinguish between conclusion's that are arrived at via factual evidence and/or speculative opinion.

I'm very interested in this report you mention, in particular, I'd like to ascertain;

Was the report published?
What was the aim of the report?
Who commissioned the report and what is their agenda?
Was the report balanced in it's content?
Were Eos given a right to reply?
Does the report clearly distinguish between opinion and fact?
What were the main recommendations of this report?

I understand if you don't have time to reply to each of these, so if you could direct me to the report, I can very quickly find out for myself.