I doubt it is stated anywhere, but it certain is implied...
The feedback was already countered. You are basically stating you trust Anduck and you do not trust me., when in your words we were both guilty of the same thing.
That's a semi-fair point, but obviously you have a bit of bias. I don't state that I do not trust you though, just that I think your trust rating specifically on Anduck is poor.
Anyone else (
not digaran) want to give an opinion on this?
Vod does seem to have left retaliatory feedback and the PM conversation is definitely not helping Vod's side. I had asked
Vod a question a few days ago but it was buried, thanks digaran, so Vod do answer this:
Why did you change your feeback to Anduck from neutral to negative, is it because Anduck said he doesn't trust you, so you wanted to change it?And DarkStar_, multiple counters are totally fine. If the rating you're countering is wrongly given, which does seem like the case here. And also this:
If a person can be tagged by multiple people for the same reason, such as a single scam instance or by being a scam buster, I don't see why multiple counters for one feedback shouldn't be allowed.