And it's also your responsibility to start new bounty threads while being banned?

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4492377.0
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4477491.0
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4462726.0
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4453171.0

There might be more, those are only the ones since June 10th (I assume WBP has been banned in the first week of June, correct?)


Why post ANN threads on behalf of others while your WBP account is banned? Someone else (who is currently not banned) could have posted that.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4457817.0

If you were only evading the ban for the sake of keeping already started bounties updated and doing the right thing for your current participants,
then why accept new offers and start new threads while you are banned? You could simply refuse the position, saying that you are currently unable to start new campaigns/accept management positions.


Who are the people that have shared access to WBP? What reason did it get banned for, and who was the one in control of the account that caused the ban?

---

Question for the moderator that eventually reads this thread:
How are ban evasions handled with shared accounts. In a regular ban scenario, a user is banned (as a person) and thus all their accounts are banned.
If an account with shared access from users X gets banned, are all users affected by this ban, or is just the user that caused the ban (thus violated forum rules) banned together with their shared account.
If so, how is it determined which user is affected by/included in the ban.

tl;dr: Does Wapinter get a free pass to evade their ban here due to the fact they gave access to their bounty account to other users or are they held responsible for the actions made in their name?