If the Bounty Manager knew that the project is scam and still promoted it than they deserve a negative trust.
But if they didn't knew about that, they are no different from bounty participants as they get paid to advertise.
If bounty manager are to be given negative trust for working on a scam project, bounty participants too deserve one as they too promote for payment.
How come that the bounty participant deserve to have a negative trust by participating a scam project? In the first place,
participant give their trust on the bounty managers, second, bounty managers must examine their project carefully by conducting a verification on the team members of that project before accepting it and lastly, bounty participant didn't get paid by promoting a scam project.
Why the hell participants are closing their eyes in evaluating the project and only Bounty manager is responsible for the scam projects.
If participant know it is a scam project , participant should make aware BM that project looks scam and give time to BM to respond or abandon the project.
If participant concerns are valid and BM is not responding or co operating then participant should immediately leave the project and open a scam accusation against BM and let the community decide then.
NEWBIE MUST NOT PUT THEIR EFFORT IN VAIN!!!![/b]
@OP , Look like you are less concerned about scam , more about your Bounty payment.