Many of us have a spreadsheet or we have read many posts with the best known managers (most of them are Legendary users) and their new bounty campaigns, but the reality is that it is not about managers to be paid for the hard work we do because if the project does not get enough funds, Nobody receives their reward. Everything depends on the success of the project, that is clear.
As for managers, do you take into consideration the rank of the user who manages the campaign?
Because I've seen Sr members in campaigns promoted by Jr. Members, so I don't know if the level of user is a deadline between Trustful, Scam or Successfully ICOs.
Manager level does not depends on the rank,it does by their reputation.The well experienced campaign managers never support the low quality projects because it will spoil their career to if it doesn't make enough funds.There are some bounty managers are there who projects are successful mostly so you can join on their bounties to make money.
As of now we can still see some newbie or jr. member managers which supposed they are part of the team and it doesnt really rely anytime with Managers rank or reputation on success of a certain ICO. Ive seen lots of scenarios where theres a newbie campaign manager but still he do able to run the campaign well and with professionalism.
But nowadays bounty hunters are always keeping an eye to those managers who have been here for years managing campaigns and for those who do have high chance of success on handling campaign.