| User name | Sent merits | Received merits | Generosity | |
| 1) | QuestionAuthority | 2255 (in 179 txns) | 307 (in 96 txns) | 2101 (max 2105) |
Yes, I know about that.
The most generous users giving merits (24 Jan 2018 - 20 Jun 2018)
I will update my first post later.
I think LoyceV and Ognasty should have more source merits to distribute. I guess LoyceV is in the test phase and doesn't have that much sMerits yet. if he/she keeps at meriting more random members it would be great.
I've recently decided to merit more posts, not to lower my standards of "quality", but just because "good posts" deserve merit too. Any "good post" is far above the average spam for which the Merit system was introduced, and I don't think people with "good posts" should be restricted in leveling up.Most of the time, I leave just 1 Merit though. I haven't really decided on when to increase it.
In my opinion, you deserve to be a merit source. Your merit distribution policy is fair.
I think I resent the fact that I'm rated 82nd for generosity. Am I being penalised because i try to help more people with my awards?
No any penalizing. Don't change your merit distribution policy.
I'm not sure what we have gained by publishing that list. Also, if it failed to detect me ( an admitted source ) then surely the analysis is flawed.
Probably this analysis will detect you as a merit source later.
So the maximum per person depends on both rank and activity, meaning that the 205 barrier to detect a merit source is incorrect since not all merit sources are Legendries, and even so the maximum would have been 400 sMerit, and no lower limit was officially provided.
Agree with you. But it is more difficult to detect such non-Legendary user as a merit source. I guess it is almost impossible.
