This is claymore eth miner, the one that the whole world uses.
Reported : ~595 MHS
Average : ~540 MHS
That's 10% difference. Sometimes is even more.
If you understand what i want to say.
Yes, thanks for this
However, this is now what I am talking about
I am talking about that over several weeks period, where xmr stak shows 11.5kh/s for a vega rig and has exact that many hashes counted by the pool, and srb or cast have 12KH/s but 10 or even 20% less hashes counted by the pool. This is data over the days or weeks, not minutes or hours. I did not try claymore, i will just stick what works for me.
nordmann666 thanks for links for older versions. Maybe I will try 1.5 but if I remember correctly, I started using srbminer at about that version. few pages ago some people were already complaining about this, so I guess I am not the only "crazy" one. The hash difference is way to high for me to simply ignore, I prefer to go back to STAK where my rigs have 500 or 300 less hashing power but have 0 doubts about hashing.
i asked here and elsewhere but no one answered...your problem is 10%
i got waves an every pool....hashrate from 2000-5500hs up and down and up and down...with EVERY miner
BUT...average hash rate is 3,9 = what SRB shows me
so i dont care about reported hasrates - i want a stable miner without issues and SRB is stable (most time)
only thing i´m not happy about - more and more settings i dont know to handle (fragments?!!?) - SRB was easy to use...but gets more and more complicated (in my opinion)