3%? ...
Bit rich for the dev fee considering that it is a ccminer clone and balloon addition.
Is there ANY reason why we would trial this out from a newbie like yourself and a code that seems to be a modified ccminer clone?
Let me know, and we will possibly have a look at it. Otherwise, there will be no way we would risk this in our mining systems, even though we have been looking at an opensource CUDA miner.
#crysx
complaining about dev fees and sporting a link to cryptopia in his sig

funniest thing i've seen all day. feel free to not mine Deft, if you are so offended paying a small fee to a decent developer.
Since WHEN is a newbie a 'decent' developer? ...
IF a developer at all?
What KIND of imbeciles are you?
Time will tell if you all lose your coins from malicious code, OR that (hopefully) this is a valued member of the community and there is value in what he is providing.
As for promoting Cryptopia - you REALLY need to see doctor regarding what is actually being promoted here and what we have as a direct link to our stock coin. Sheesh!
#crysx
You don't have to trust the code if you don't want to.
It's healthy to be a bit skeptical about unknown binaries on the internet.
The source is available, and is based on cpuminer, if you want to verify it yourself.
One of the reasons for creating this miner was for me to learn more about CUDA.
aaand THIS is the respectful answer I was hoping to receive ...
The other has been reported - and hopefully deleted soon.
If this is what you will be doing, then we may be able to work with you, alongside you, or even just as a consultative means of bouncing your learning curve against us. We have been around for a long time and have worked with the best CUDA devs in the CryptoIndustry, so a clean codebase AND proof of this is all I was suggesting. Apart from a hefty 3% margin for you. Though as stated above that imbeciles post, we would be more than happy to test and run as long as our dev approves of it.
#crysx