It sounds very reasonable. Instead of just dismissing Notabot, it holds him accountable. I think this action also strengthens the community by maintaining its membership instead of just casting out the "unwanted."

I have made a recent error with my articles and instead of just throwing me to the curb, the error was pointed out and, even though it was an honest oversight on my part, I felt better for having the chance to correct it. And as a result of that, there is a possibility of a new category resulting from that issue.

I'm in favor of the atonement of Notabot being proposed by UTB.