I think that most merit sources do not need any merit.
Actually merit sources should not need merit at all. To avoid conflict of interest.
This post illustrates the one major flaw in the merit system - it has a commercial value. It really should be a means of recognition and guidance for posters. The commercial value means that some members are prostituting themselves to gain merit.
I don't understand how there can be a conflict of interest in awarding merits to merit sources. If you don't understand the function of a merit source, and how they work, then I created an article for my blog site.
https://talkmerit.com/the-source/index.php/articles/the-bitcoin-talk-merit-system