Using merit restrictions is an easy way for a lazy manager to appear to be doing his job.

Actually this topic was brought up a few weeks back and I specifically remember Hilariousetc stating that having a minimum requirement for joining will only encourage people to buy/trade merits.
My take on this is that there are a large number of people who post meaningful content but they dont get merits either because they post in sections where merit sources dont patrol or the merit sources ran out of merits. Bottom line is that we need an increased number of merit sources patrolling every section of the forum if we are to make merit as a "criteria" of being selected as a "good poster".
Due to the subjective nature of merit - this is almost impossible to counter.
Yes I do see that as well. Not to mention that a +10 Merit in difference of their ranks is not that hard to obtain. I mean any account farmer who have at least 1 high ranking alt account can distribute its sMerits to its alt accounts. I am just thinking about the possible scenarios here. I still do see that it is always about the bounty campaign manager and who is and will be accepted in part of their campaign, if they are strict on who will be part of the campaign then minimum merit requirements is not even needed.