In a bull market they tend to rise more than bitcoin: hence in a bull market the bitcoin dominance tends to lower.
Conversely in a bear market those coins tend to drop faster than bitcoin: the bitcoin dominance tends to rise.
it is not only about the speed of rise/drop. it is about the fact that there is only 1 bitcoin which is going against 1700 altcoins. that is why calling it "dominance" is wrong to begin with. if altcoins were good then the real dominance of bitcoin should have been 0.05% instead of forty something! being at forty... just proves that altcoins are indeed shitcoins Conversely in a bear market those coins tend to drop faster than bitcoin: the bitcoin dominance tends to rise.
I only found more interesting the first derivative of the dominance to the bitcoin price, rather than the value of dominance.
But you are correct and I do agree!
Will you ever see this post?
My two cents,
F1
unfortunately bitcointalk does not have the option to give you an alert or something whenever one of your comments is quoted so usually people miss it unless they manually go back to the topics and check the replies to see it for themselves. which I happened to do right now.
