Now what bothers me is there are about 3-4 other healthcare startups what brought you to criticize this one,
Yet another red flag, the all-too-typical, "There are lots of other suspect ICOs like ours, why aren't you bothering them?" dishonest deflection attempt.
What bothers me is that I can't quite reconcile your place in this as a Johns Hopkins, MIT graduate math whizz, who just happened to have been auctioning off his signature shortly before this rushed ICO appeared.
I'm auctioning off my signature. I will make on average around 50 posts per month for winner. The rules for this auction are:
I have the right to reject bids or advertisements. You can offer a different one of course.
I have the right to shorten, extend, restart or cancel the auction at any point in time.
If the service turns out to be a scam, I'll remove the ad and your money will not be refunded.
The auction winner must provide payment and the signature ad code within 48 hours of a request via PM or red trust will be left
The auction will end in 14 days
The time frame for your signature can be from one month or you can PM for longer
Willing to advertise anything thats not a scam (no glow tags) see above.
WILLING TO DISCUSS THINGS ON SKYPE bitsintheclouds
Starting bid 0.01
How exactly did you come to join this project as the 'ICO advisor' who is, by your own claim, 'advising them on how to build a seamless blockchain to move data from chain to chain', having clearly had no connection to the project back in April when you were shilling your 'LEDGENDARY' signature space?