You are mistaken. Though Active Mining has no working silicon, the projected power efficiency is substantially lower than Bitfury (previous gen tech) and all of the current 28nm chips.
That's complete BS. You don't know the details.
Who are you anyway? You registered 3days ago and have only posted in ACtM thread. Are you Crumbs? Iceman? Pankkake? You freak.
If you feel that understanding of silicon design basics is related to activity on this forum, I'm afraid you are mistaken. Your beligerance won't change this.
ActM has working silicon as they have sold products to customers who are in receipt of said products. Intellihash (shush!) compatible silicon and associated specs are presently unknown.
Please quantify 'substantially' in the context of your post referencing Bitfury's previous and current tech. as this might allow for clarity. Whilst I'm an appreciator of efficient use of language, I have reservations about your limited responses. Do forgive my suspicious nature however, sadly, this is the state of play.
If you wish to fantasize about shipped product using Active Mining silicon, I can not stop you. I can, on the other hand, remind you that Active Mining has made no statements about shipping products containing Active Mining chips, and no evidence of such chips exists.
Since Active Mining silicon most likely does not exist, no specs for said silicon exist. I can say with 100% certainty that no official specs have been released by Active Mining, so you will have to satisfy yourself with "substantially," as inexact as it may be.
I do not begrudge you your suspicious nature, though I am saddened by how poorly it has served you in the field of giving your money to strangers on the internet.