You are mistaken. Though Active Mining has no working silicon, the projected power efficiency is substantially lower than Bitfury (previous gen tech) and all of the current 28nm chips.
That's complete BS. You don't know the details.
Who are you anyway? You registered 3days ago and have only posted in ACtM thread. Are you Crumbs? Iceman? Pankkake? You freak.
Actually it's is fundamental engineering.
An FPGA hardcopy will always be less power efficient than custom silicon. Based on actual, real hardware in the field, any easic hardware will consume > KNC's 1.3 W/Gh/s.
FPGAs are obsolete in the world of custom silicon.
So what was your old name? Is that you VBS?
KNC is about 1 W/hr per GH/s. ActM should be around 0.8 - 0.9 W/hr per GH/s (
). Actually KNC's 28nm is far above the minimum W per GH possible for 28nm device. ActM biggest unit pricing for customers starts from $5.9 per GH/s which makes it more then compatible. For the ActM mining farm those prices won't be $5.9 per GH but much less. All of those added to the announcement that we are about to begin the normal volume production soon makes me believe ActM is on track to make a huge profit both from hardware sells and from mining.