Don't play innocent victim here. You viciously attacked PAXUM with your unproovable facts, the post you are referring in your thread is a direct response to you attacking Paxum without submitting any proof whatsoever. You screwed yourself over on this one. I'm just providing my opinion based on what I sow you did here in this thread.
EDIT: even if Paxum isn't your direct competitor doesn't make a difference that you attacked them without any evidence to your claims. Very unethical.
Are you a member of the Paxum team? How did my warnings regarding a third company affected you personally to the point you had the need to attack our company on our thread? If you see my post a few above this one, you will notice I have posted FACTUAL information on why PAXUM is at the very least suspicious, employing the same people than Epassporte.
To say that two companies that employed the same high-rank questionable employee (FACT), that are in the exact same niche (Adult business - FACT) and that they have a very similar payment processing business model (FACT) is far from viscously attacking a company with unprovable facts.
I was asked to provide proof that Chris Mallick owns Paxum, however, do you believe that if Chris Mallick were to start a new business in the exact same niche, with the exact same business model, and with the same employees (at least one verifiable) after the epassporte fiasco he wouldn't use a proxy, or testaferro? Do you still believe that what I am saying is completely baseless? Because there is a very vast grey area between completely baseless and completely factual.
If you read my original thread, I told Jered to be careful with this company. That's it. That is not an attack. They are not my competitors. I am trying to help companies and members.
What I did is not unethical. Furthermore, it is the only
ethical thing to do, for me to come in here, and warn people so they don't loose their hard earned money to people I honestly believe are questionable, and I did it under my username by the way, under my business name at the risk of having my business dragged all over the floor.
You are of course entitled to your own opinions and ideas. I will not call you an idiot, or a crazy person. I don't know you at all, I would never do that. I will never make fun of you either for a few misspellings you have in your post. I am just curious as to why some members deemed it appropriate to attack me in such a vicious when I have NEVER attacked them. If Chris Mallick would come to this forum (he never would though) and attack me, I would understand it, but why this?