I read to the part above. At that point I realized there's no point in discussing anything with you at all.

It seems like you do not grasp the concept of discussing in a polite, civilized and intelligent manner. If you did, you would be part of a forum of debate where arguments and counter-arguments can be discussed among adults.

If you do not show any respect to the people you discuss with, you jump to conclusions and in general does  not ask the counterparty to elaborate if a point is unclear, but rather goes for silly attacks, then there's no discussion, but just shouting.

Namecalling and being condescending will lead you nowhere. If you do not see what I'm referring to, see the quoted part above.

Now, if you'd in a calm, polite and intelligent manner pointed out what you think I was doing wrong, or what was wrong about my arguments or my viewpoints, then we'd have a discussion. And perhaps we'd both learn a thing or two.

Remember that a forum post can be tongue-in-cheek, it can be trolling, it can be polarizing, it can be humorous, and anything else. If I were you, I would not read too much into a single post.

For instance, I might be leaning to the fact that you have anger issues. Or that you lack social antennas. But going down that road, where would that lead us? Exactly so - absolutely nowhere.

What's interesting to discuss is bitcoin, and in this thread it was about bitcoin receiving criticism. Which is perfectly fine. And something anybody should be able to discuss, even the pro-bitcoiners. It's not like an intelligent pro-bitcoiner only want to hear the positive about bitcoin.

You could try again if you want to continue the discussion, but then you should phrase yourself with respect towards your discussion partners, and use a polite and civilized language which would aid in constructive debate, and not dirt-throwing.

If you do not like my arguments, then argue against them, judging and being condescending against my person is not very constructive.