Well the sooner the better as various technological options are available like burning coal vs solar energy or one supplementing the other. Whereas prevention of double spending and forcing honesty in block creation as an incentive for energy consuming miners but failure to provide an incentive for stake holders would hinder the expansion of peer to peer nodes that would have make any decentralized network operate at a higher quality.
Again, appreciate the input - but again, you give us nothing that anyone who reads these threads or can read on Wikipedia does not already know. NOTHING happens over night, NOTHING happens without someone paying for it AND our recent history has proven that the GUN coin team is moving the coin in the right direction and getting things done. The coin is now a technologically current, stable, secure and safe crypto currency that firearms users can use to replace their merchant accounts. If you think we are going to dump a years worth of work and blindly move the coin to PoS on a whim to satisfy the current fad, you are sadly mistaken. You do not need to educated us or anyone else on PoS vs PoW, that is pointless. Guncoin has a mission that I have stated over and over and over again that is NOT going to change. While you make interesting generic comments, they have ZERO effect on our path forward for GUNCOIN as they offer no solutions, offers to help or anything but generic facts. As far as providing incentive to stakeholders, there are plenty in my recent posts here and on Telegram to answer those questions.