BCH is a system made up of inanimate entities. Accordingly, BCH doesn't claim anything.
Correct, in this instance I was referring to the backers of BCH, passing it off as BTC.
Sorry if that wasn't clear
Nope. Still not clear.
So who are 'the backers'? The uncountable masses who hold and use BCH, or do you have a more specific set of people in mind?
I'll help. Roger Ver. Roger Ver is using his influence to trick people into thinking BCH is "the real bitcoin." He's stated this numerous times. He goes out of his way to add confusion about bitcoin for the sake of his own profit. One needn't look further than bitcoin.com for confirmation of this, where he uses his ownership of the domain to muddy the distinctions between the two, frequently creating links that go to BCH-related content when they should be going to BTC-related content.
There, happy now?
I wasn't unhappy before.
So let me see if I understand you.
One single person is passing BCH off as BTC*, so you believe that then entire chain should be attacked.
Is that correct?
* (an assertion, BTW, with which I do not see any evidence of)
(Incidentally, are you nutildah also steamtyme?)