Not really sure if anyone attacking Bcash really can be called Bitcoin purists. Merely acknowledging Ver's baby might almost be called recognition of it as a "competitor". Methinks the purists aren't at all bothered by what's going on with alternative chains and only focusing on Bitcoin.

I mean, I can understand having a point to prove, but should we prove it with the 30 or so forks (more?!) of Bitcoin? They're the ones with points to prove, after all. Not Bitcoin.