All your evidence is circumstantial.

So without digging down into the individual points, which I have little doubt are factually correct;

With such a vast range of facts to draw-from after the fact, you will no doubt find many that are supportive.
You have cherry picked a number of factual situations and used inference to connect it to your initial supposition.
It's the same thing all the conspiracy theorists do.

Not being able to disprove something doesn't give it any more weight.
Being cool and something many of us want to believe, doesn't give it any more weight.
A combination of cherry picked events/facts with plausable explanations which support your initial suppostion doesn't give it any more weight.
The sum of the parts is zero.


Truthfully, I'm open to your idea, but you need something more, what have you got that really supports what you believe?