I see many Websites that provide ratings for ongoing ICOs or for the future. Examples such as the ICObench.com Website, ICOrating.com and others.
Which is my question whether you believe in the rating provided by the website. Seeing many ICO's do not match what they value. Many ICOs are arguably good ratings but when the token sales of the project only reach softcap. And there are projects that I see have a fairly mediocre rating but their token sales reach hardcap. I took the example of Lalaworld on ICObench.com they get Rating 3.7 but their token is sold out.
So let's discuss ICO Rating!
No, I don't. Prefer to make own judgements based on my own researching. In order to pick up a worthwhile project, just pay attention to what makes any project being a real project:
- understandable and reachable idea and/or concept (something, what is gonna be useful/used by you/used by loads of people);
- solid wp and understandable roadmap;
- website;
- presence of MVP;
- linkedin profiles of team members (they in their turn must be very experienced and competent in the area they're working in);
- media coverage;
- active community support, etc.
These are the criteria of a promising and successful project, including one my most favorite - Cryptics. Check it out, it's the example of a trustworthy project