Nope, they all have a ton of evidence behind them and are normal examples of evolution, you can find hundreds. All of them with evidence and proof. You can see it in humans, there are plenty of fossils of our ancestors.
https://hastyreader.com/anagenesis-cladogenesis/
All of these are documented facts, you are just delusional.
Dude, the amount of disinformation... I never thought that people could really believe these things...
I mean, it's all there, you just have to learn how to understand certain principles and use different tools such as statistics, mathematics, biology, physics (etc..), and you will be able to understand so many things. You will also realize how little you previously knew and wonder how much more knowledge there is that you do not possess..
But why would you do all that boring work and study these things for years to get the understanding you need when you can just google some attractive, mystical conspiracy subjects and theories for 2 hours and feel like you understand and know everything.
A single evolution mutation in a plant or animal would not be large enough to be noticeable without microscopic examination. The before and after animals would be essentially the same.
Any plant or animal in the fossil record that is considered to be a missing link, would have to have thousands or millions more missing links before it and after it, to become the missing link that it is considered to be. These missing links are not available or visible in the fossil record anywhere.
If you change evolution theory so that you don't need all these missing links, then you would find easily recognized evolution changes all over the place today outside the fossil record, in everyday life.
The fact that adaptation explains all the so-called evolution evidences better, along with a fossil record that has no missing links, shows that ...
Evolution is a hoax.
Evolution happens over a period of hundreds of thousands even millions of years. Every generation of a species mutates "a little" as you mentioned and there's no noticeable way to see it (without DNA analysis) but when you take, lets say, a thousand generations the first and the thousandth generation are so much different from each other (since every generation is a little bit different than the previous) you get 2 different species. Those species (distinct species, not just 2 generations that came 1 after the other keep that in mind) are considered links in a chain of evolution. Now, where is the line that separates 1 species from another, in which generation does 1 species become another I don't know. that question you need to ask someone who's more specialized in the field.
If you don't understand these simple things how can you claim evolution is a hoax lol..
It's as if I said "hey man the gods are angry" each time there's thunder just cose I can't understand or am not educated enough to understand whats really going on.
Knowlege is power, man, I wish more people realized that.