Mike,
I just listened to
your interview on AgoristRadio, which was fun. A question for you: something that would be useful--nay, essential--in a laundering service is the assurance that one will receive
new coins and not receive back
any of the same coins of the original lot.
Not any not one! Agreed?
Are you sure that's a good idea? Under some circumstances surely it'd be possible to match large incoming transactions with outgoing ones by the fact they have no coins in common. (
Edit: In fact, this attack would probably work quite well against flows of smaller transactions too.)