Post
Topic
Board Reputation
Re: Low reputation because of fraud/scam accusations.
by
audaciousbeing
on 04/07/2018, 19:50:24 UTC
Hi everyone!
This is Andrew from MARK.SPACE.

Found out this topic https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3286443.msg34279208#msg34279208, raised by Pistacia.
Lauda gave negative feedback, which seriously damaged project reputation.

Guys just got it wrong, misunderstood. Look: Lauda's comment is "They were supposed to pay out 'The Whitepaper states 15 million tokens (0.5% of the overall ico pool)', yet they paid less than 1 million due to their own greed, thereby also committing fraud. Scam project, avoid this team and anything related to them."  

"Token allocation" section in our WP says that 0.5% out of total ICO pool (3 billion tokens) is allocated for all bounty events from 2018 to 2021(15 million tokens).
Which does not mean we will pay them at once! And we never stated we pay this sum at once. It's our Bounty fund, which will be used for paying bloggers, helpers, all reap media supporters till full launch of a platform in 2021.
We have 2 rounds of ICO, second one will be in 2019, so Bounty fund tokens will be spent gradually.  
Moreover, this fund will be spent on project testing and there will be another Bounty campaign for bug searching.
And even if we put some simple logic in this situation, we have got two rounds of token sale 1)2018 2)2019, why people think we should spend all fund on first round? It's just wrong position to ask all fund to be paid... It's absolutely unfair, don't you think so ?

MARK.SPACE has a lot to do, we dont need low trust because of misunderstanding !

The first question I would ask would be have you put forward your argument to Lauda because she does not just give a negative feedback and when that happen, only her can remove it. If yes, then the only thing you can do is to wait and focus on your project. Based on your response, it seems it might be case of misunderstanding in which you were not expressly clear in your White Paper and for someone who have participated in the campaign would have a target in mind of what he is expected to earn at the end only to be cut short because of further interpretation of the wordings he had relied upon. Also, try to quickly resolve it with your bounty participants because I am they are the one to call Lauda's attention to it.