Personaly I don't think that Trump will do any good to USA. Actualy with him USA lost the chance to become the greatest leading country in the world again.
He will only make the crisis deeper and make the new enemies, can't see how could this contribute to progress.
What Donald Trump is doing is solely for the USA citizens and them alone. He doesn't care about what the other countries think about the US as long as the US citizens are happy and they seem to be very pleased with what he is doing for them except the Liberals who are never going to be happy even if Trump makes it rain gold.
Trump may be making it 'rain gold' in Israel, but it ain't happening at my place here in the good old USA. Frankly, except for the very welcome screwing of the EPA, I've not seen much of anything change. Lot of talk and a lot of excuses about the mean old 'deep state' while he stuffs his cabinet full of them.
I have the same question about the water output of the new foxconn wisconsin plants... last summer to swim this lake? there is a difference between streamlining and letting all go south.
But why would trump admin sacrifice this lake and filters and what ever is in those waters is harvest-able... thanks for your message tvbcof.
But...but it's a DIFFERENT SWAMP!!!
some are so corrupt, so beyond anything what is constituting human being, that I believe that the D.C. Swamp is full of the vomit of the patriots, who seeing this feast of traitors and criminal can't manage their stomach properly.
emissionless electronic assembly factory is a little bit the basic standard that should be implemented now in the usa, however it is more expensive to build than giving a few checks to mr scott pruitt and his associates than making something great.
it's a little bit like the coal mining... it isn't. It's mountain top removal.


This is an interesting way to see things... and ask, what is really going?
but don't get me wrong, as horrible and denaturing mtr "mining" is, at least in a few years, it is just the topography that changed... contrary to a nuclear incident.
I have seen the trump admin understand the severity of the mass human invasions of those born in unsustainable area toward still habitable area (to destroy them by continuing the same behaviors and mental attitude that lead their former homeland to become waste and filthy, but I don't remember of hearing anything about the current mass extinctions of the planetary life system support... Generally, biodiversity recovers 5 to 10 million years after the extinction event. In the most severe mass extinctions it may take 15 to 30 million years... at least nuke fallout will be mostly merged in the background.
the exact topic is "
Anthropogenic ecocide"
The term ecocide is more recently used to refer to the destructive impact of humanity on its own natural environment. As a group of complex organisms we are committing ecocide through unsustainable exploitation of the planet's resources. The geological era we are living in, known as the anthropocene, is so named because the activities of the human species are influencing the Earth's natural state in a way never seen before. The most notable example is that of the atmosphere which is being transformed through the emission of gases from fossil fuel use : carbon dioxide, methane, chlorofluorocarbons etc. The ecocide we are witnessing is a symptom of the disregard and reward for accounting for the damage being caused. U.S. environmental theorist and activist Patrick Hossay [3] argues that the human species is committing ecocide, via industrial civilization's effects on the global environment. Much of the modern environmental movement stems from this belief as a precept.
the problem is how to abord this theme with the hordes of freshly breeded "human" worldwide, who sees the earth support system has things made for them to be plundered, exploited and destroyed for their own little benefits, and the disadvantage and pain of the rest of the world and specially advanced.
I find fun how brazilians always said: we can destroy our rain forest because europeans destroyed their own forest before in europe. And I find fun that this lame argument was accepted. In my opinion it would be easier to wipe brazilian population until they fit inside an acceptable level to not hurt the rain forest, that doesn't belong to them.
so yes, anthropogenic ecocide ask the question of extra territoriality, specifically among the "savages" and with "domestic corrupts" too.
and then come those with their traditions, we have the right to kill the last whale because we killed all the previous ones...
most should read about what happen to rats when overpopulation start to be terminal in an ecosystem...