I wouldn't bother reading a study done by an oil company. The chance of bias is too high.
I wouldn't bother reading a study done by a govt linked entity. The chance of bias is too high.
Govt: Global Warming will destroy the world unless you pay more taxes & let me micromanage your life
Govt Scientist: It's true
Like I've repeatedly said, I read science publications, and the overall sense I get from such reading is that science is overwhelmingly on the side of anthropogenic climate change.
So you don't have specific evidence? M'kay.
If I provided you with some particular page, document, etc., you would simply claim that I cherry picked that document.
I give up. My logic is no match for your mind reading skills.
The rest... tl;dr. It's useless when you ignore repeated calls for evidence
I think my post above qualified as being more thoughtful and earnest. I also think it was filled with some reasonable advice. Interpret it as you wish. As for evidence, I indicated how you could go about discovering evidence on your own.