I thought you do a very good job researching and finding the truth, not sue how and from where did you got this half cooked and untrue understanding. MeFy is not a rushed ICO, I believe you know that we have not even started its marketing nor have we announced pre-sales dates, so not sure how did you got an understanding that its a rushed ICO.
Ignoring the suspicious similarities between your writing and that of lowbander80 'Mark', let's address this repeated claim from your side that this is not a rushed ICO.
Presale commences [Starting 4th June] Min/Max Contribution: 20-300 ETH Min/Max Contribution: 2-50 BTC
Min/Max Contribution: 30,000-500,000 XMV
You just registered your mefy.io domain in April, so the split into this 'rebranding' could only have been a recent idea. You then posted up the details of your magical medical blockchain/AI/IoT/Smart Contract behemoth ICO in May, with a pre-sale beginning 4th June.
I'd say the evidence is pretty clear that this is a rushed ICO.
It also doesn't help your case that lowbander80, your ICO promoter and self-professed 'ICO Adviser'-cum-blockchain-expert, can't quite get his story straight on whether he is the original owner of that account or not. So, in that you are clearly involved in two ICOs, no matter what you want to claim now you've hurriedly had your profile removed from the other one, and you are associating with people of highly questionable integrity and honesty to promote this one, I'd say there is little reason to consider this ICO as anything less than a cynical grab-for-cash FOMO buzzword sale.
You'd be far better off cancelling this ICO and, if you are a legitimate operation, going about it the right way instead which includes oversight managed by one of the big four audit firms and having the ICO funds held in escrow. Taking the time to provide proper controls and oversight will serve to assuage the concerns surrounding your platform.