Well, maybe I didn't put it right.

What I tried to say was that the Movement is based on voluntarism. You can't point towards a fixed group of people who are any more responsible for the success or failure of the project than they decide to be.

Like, if you have an ICO, you give people money to work on something. There's something you can expect from them. The Movement didn't have an ICO, neither does it have a small team holding a high percentage of MVT, so there is no authority to point towards. And while this is pretty much the very basis of what the Movement is supposed to be and I absolutely like the idea, I am well aware of it being a problem.

Hope this makes more sense.